The steps of the scientific arbitration process in detail
Definition of the scientific arbitration process:
It is a critical audit process aimed at checking, reviewing and evaluating a scientific document of all kinds and its results by specialized arbitrators in the same field of the document, as they are selected according to specific rules and formed into a jury. The scientific arbitration process takes place before the publication of the scientific document.
The arbitrators decide whether the scientific document should be published or not, based on the evaluation items of the scientific document that judge its efficiency, quality, strength or weakness, and how important it is for publication. The strengths and weaknesses of the document are also determined during this process.
Objectives of the scientific arbitration process:
The scientific arbitration process is one of the main pillars in scientific and academic publishing, as it plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality and credibility of scientific research and articles.this process is subject to strict criteria aimed at achieving several fundamental goals related to evaluating scientific work and determining its merit for publication.
Below we review the most important goals that the scientific arbitration process seeks to achieve:
1. The arbitration process aims to make a fair and transparent judgment on a scientific work, by determining how strong or weak it is and how worthy it is to be published.
2. It also aims to include principles and fundamentals for judging the reliability of data and information provided by the author-researcher.
3. The arbitration process seeks to distinguish high-level scientific documents and judge them for publication, while low-quality documents give the due level.
4. In addition, the process is aimed at achieving a fair and unbiased assessment of scientific documents, raising them by rejecting useless works.
5. In general, the arbitration process is aimed at achieving the goal of preparing a scientific document by revealing its strengths and weaknesses.
6. The arbitration process is also aimed at determining the strength or weakness of a scientific document. This is done by evaluating the methods used, the quality of the data, and analyzing the results. Judging helps determine whether the research is worth publishing or needs additional improvements.
7. One of the main goals of the arbitration process is the inclusion of principles and fundamentals for judging the reliability of the data and information composed by the author-researcher, the accuracy of the data and the methodology of their collection and analysis are checked, which ensures the reliability of the researcher's findings.
8. The judging process aims to identify high-quality scientific documents and judge them for publication, this means that high-quality research that makes important contributions to the scientific field receives appropriate recognition and recognition.
9. Achieving a fair evaluation of scientific documents is another goal of the arbitration process. This includes ensuring that all research gets equal opportunities for evaluation without any bias or discrimination, which enhances the credibility and transparency of the whole process.
10. The arbitration process aims to raise the status of scientific documents of all kinds by rejecting useless scientific documents, this helps maintain the quality of published research and ensures that the scientific content available to readers is of real scientific value.
11. One of the main objectives is also to achieve the goal of preparing a scientific document, arbitration helps to ensure that the research achieves its purpose and adds new value to scientific knowledge in its field.
12. Finally, the arbitration process aims to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the scientific document, this allows researchers to improve and develop their work based on the feedback they receive from the arbitrators
The importance of the scientific arbitration process:
The scientific arbitration process has a great importance and a distinguished role in the development of Science and its wide dissemination, and the most prominent achievements of the arbitration process are the following:
Development of unified international controls and standards:
It contributes to the development of unified international controls and standards for the arbitration of scientific research, which contributes to improving the quality of research and scientific studies.
Ensuring the publication of high-quality research:
Arbitration processes allow ensuring the publication of high-quality research and scientific papers in their scientific specialties, which contributes to the widespread publication of the most important scientific studies in various countries of the world, which has a great role in advancing scientific progress and development.
Rejection of low-quality research:
It prevents the publication of scientific papers and researches whose quality is low, or which are stolen or have a high citation rate, which contributes to the advancement of scientific disciplines and the development of societies and the well-being of their members.
Highlighting strengths and weaknesses:
The arbitration process contributes to showing the strengths that the researcher has adhered to the various criteria for judging scientific research, and weaknesses that need to be adjusted, or those that may cause the rejection of the publication of scientific research.
Discovering the possibilities of the researcher:
The arbitration processes allow to discover the possibilities, skills and knowledge of the scientific researcher, and also show the importance of scientific research and the benefit it provides to science and societies.
Requirements for admission to highly ranked universities:
There are many highly rated universities that students target to study at the postgraduate stages, whether with a doctorate or a master's degree, require among the admission criteria the publication of a research or scientific paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Requirements for obtaining scientific degrees:
Scientific publications in refereed journals may be a requirement for obtaining some scientific degrees.
Steps of the scientific arbitration process:
The scientific arbitration process is a vital step in ensuring the quality and integrity of scientific research before publication, this process aims to evaluate research by specialized experts in the relevant field, to ensure its credibility, originality and importance.
The steps of the scientific arbitration process are detailed below:
1. Submit research to the journal
The arbitration process begins with the researcher's submission of his scientific work to the relevant journal, the research must comply with the publication requirements of the Journal in terms of form and content, and its topic should be within the scope of the journal's interest.
Submitting a research to a scientific journal is an important step in a researcher's academic and professional career.the scientific arbitration process aims to assess the quality, credibility and originality of research by experts in the field. this process enhances the credibility of research and contributes to the development of scientific knowledge.
2. Preliminary examination by the editor
The preliminary examination by the editor is a crucial step in the scientific arbitration process, as the scientific documents received for publication are evaluated accurately and professionally, this step plays an important role in ensuring the quality of research published in prestigious and internationally recognized scientific journals.
The editor of the journal conducts a preliminary examination of the research to verify that it meets such basic requirements as originality and relevance of the topic, and to make sure that there are no ethical problems or conflicts of interest. At this stage, the research may be rejected directly if it does not comply with the standards of the journal.
3. Selection of arbitrators
The selection of arbitrators in the scientific arbitration process is a crucial step that significantly affects the quality of research and scientific studies published in academic journals, this process aims to ensure transparency and integrity in the evaluation of research and ensure the level of quality and suitability for publication.
The selection of arbitrators requires multiple considerations, including scientific expertise, professional competence, and scientific ethics, to ensure that objective and fair evaluations of the submitted research are provided.
If the research has passed the initial examination, the editor selects a group of arbitrators specializing in the field of research, usually these arbitrators are academics or experts with extensive experience and deep knowledge of the topic.
Importance of selection of arbitrators:
The selection of arbitrators plays an essential role in:
* Scientific quality assurance: the identification of qualified arbitrators contributes to the provision of accurate and scientific evaluations of research, which ensures the quality and validity of the results.
* Transparency and integrity: the selection of arbitrators helps to avoid bias and ensure that research is evaluated objectively, without personal or financial influences.
* Enhancing academic confidence: the selection of arbitrators enhances the ability to publish reliable and documented research, which contributes to enhancing confidence in scientific journals and academic institutions.
4. Sending the research to the arbitrators
In the process of scientific arbitration, sending the research to the arbitrators is a crucial and important step to ensure the quality and credibility of the results reached, this process includes a set of steps and principles that must be carefully followed to ensure a fair and accurate assessment of scientific research.
The research is sent to the selected arbitrators for thorough review. The identity of researchers and arbitrators is kept confidential to ensure the integrity of the process and avoid bias.
5. Review of arbitrators
The scientific arbitration process is a crucial stage in the course of scientific research, where the arbitrators evaluate the research submitted for publication as a new and high-quality scientific contribution.the arbitrators are selected based on their expertise and diverse fields of competence, to ensure accurate and objective evaluations.
The judges carefully read the research and evaluate it in terms of:
* Originality: ensure that the research provides new knowledge or a new vision in the field.
* Methodology: assessment of the correctness and accuracy of the methods used in the research.
* Results: verification of the validity of the results and their relevance.
* Writing: evaluate the clarity and accuracy of writing and presentation.
The importance of arbitrators ' review
The review of the arbitrators enhances the objectivity of the scientific process and ensures the publication of high-quality research, and it also contributes to achieving credibility and transparency in the scientific field, thanks to the efforts of the arbitrators, confidence in the results and conclusions that emerge from this process is enhanced.
6. Submission of Arbitration reports
The scientific arbitration process is one of the basic steps in the world of scientific research, where arbitration reports play a vital role in evaluating research and studies before they are published or presented to the scientific public.
The importance of Arbitration reports is to assess the quality and scientific credibility of the submitted documents, and they reflect the details and recommendations of field experts who determine whether the research should be published or not and the extent to which it is useful in the field.
The arbitrators submit detailed reports that include their observations and evaluations of the research, and give recommendations on whether the research should be accepted, rejected, or requested to be modified. Recommendations can include:
* Acceptance of the search: if the search meets all the required criteria.
* Conditional acceptance of amendments: if the research needs minor amendments.
* Rejection of the search: if the search contains material defects.
7. Making the final decision
The scientific arbitration process is a vital process in the world of scientific research, as it plays an important role in determining the credibility and quality of research and studies that are prepared and submitted for publication.
The importance of making the final decision in this process is to confirm or deny the possibility of publishing a scientific document, and, consequently, its impact on the scientific community and society in general.
The editor of the journal reviews the reports and recommendations of the arbitrators, and then makes the final decision on the research, the decision can include:
* Acceptance of the research for publication: if this is recommended by the arbitrators.
* Request amendments: if the research requires improvements before acceptance.
* Refusal of the search: if it does not meet the necessary criteria.
8. Inform the researcher of the decision
The scientific arbitration process represents a crucial stage in the life of a researcher, where scientific work is subjected to careful evaluation by independent experts in the field, and one of the most important steps of this process is to inform the researcher of the final decision determined by the arbitrators after arbitration.
This notification of the decision is an important moment that determines the course of the research and significantly affects its future.
The researcher is informed about the decision of the journal, including the reports of the arbitrators and their comments, if there is a need for amendments, the researcher is asked to make the required amendments and resubmit the research.
9. Review of amendments
The arbitration process is one of the basic foundations in the evaluation of scientific research, as it seeks to achieve objectivity and fairness in the evaluation of research before publication or approval, with the advancement of Science and technology, there have been many amendments to this process to enhance its transparency and improve its quality
The arbitrators review the revised version of the research if any amendments are required, to ensure that the researcher has responded appropriately to their observations.
10. Preparation for publication
After the research is finally accepted, it is edited and formatted according to the journal's standards, and then included in the journal's publication schedule to be published in the next issue.